Everyday Tools · Updated August 2026

Best Design-Forward Wireless Speakers

Wireless speakers become interesting when the object has to share a room with furniture. We compared three very different approaches: Sonos hiding complexity inside an ecosystem, Bang & Olufsen treating the speaker as architecture, and Devialet compressing extreme output into a small sculptural object.

Sonos Era 300
Sonos Era 300
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A9 in Sienna Brown, complete speaker and legs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A9
Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
Devialet Phantom II 98 dB

The Row

Sonos Era 300
Best Overall

Sonos Era 300

At $479, six amplifiers, Dolby Atmos, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, AirPlay 2 and mature multi-room integration make the strongest all-around value case.

Bang & Olufsen Beosound A9 in Sienna Brown, complete speaker and legs
Design benchmark

Bang & Olufsen Beosound A9

Seven drivers and a $4,650 starting point make this as much interior object as wireless speaker.

Devialet Phantom II 98 dB
Compact sculpture

Devialet Phantom II 98 dB

400 watts RMS and 18Hz–21kHz output from a 4.3kg body is the clearest engineering spectacle of the three.

The Ledger

The evidence sheet

ProductPriceArchitectureConnectivityWhat the premium buys
Sonos Era 300$4796 amps · 4 tweeters · 2 woofersWi-Fi · Bluetooth · AirPlay 2 · line-in via adapterSpatial audio, room tuning and one of the strongest whole-home ecosystems
Beosound A9From $4,6507 driversConnected multi-room platformFurniture-scale design, customization and B&O object value
Phantom II 98 dB~$1,450 / CHF 1,450 market-dependent400W RMS · 3 driversWi-Fi · AirPlay · Bluetooth · Spotify Connect · UPnPExtreme output-to-volume ratio and proprietary amplification architecture
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A9 in Sienna Brown in a furnished room
The A9 earns its design argument at room scale: textile, a circular silhouette and slender legs make it read as furniture. Sienna Brown shown. Photograph: Bang & Olufsen.
Premium Test

When does speaker design earn real money?

Design has value when the speaker is permanently visible. But the premium should still buy more than shape. Sonos makes the strongest rational case because the industrial design arrives with a mature ecosystem. Devialet converts money into compactness and physical output. B&O is the honest luxury choice: the speaker's role in the room is part of the product.

The decision that actually matters

Start with the room, not the spec sheet. If the speaker becomes part of a wider TV or multi-room system, Sonos wins on architecture. If it must look intentional in a carefully designed room, the A9 does something almost no conventional speaker attempts. If the constraint is physical volume but you still want dramatic output, Phantom II is the specialist.

Who should buy what

  • Era 300: most buyers who want one premium wireless speaker with credible expansion options.
  • Beosound A9: buyers treating audio as part of the interior-design budget.
  • Phantom II: buyers who value compactness and engineering spectacle more than ecosystem breadth.

The catch

Sound quality remains room- and listener-dependent. Published driver counts, wattage and frequency response cannot establish tonal preference, imaging or how each speaker behaves in your actual space.

The Row · Final verdict

Sonos Era 300

The Era 300 is the best balance because the design premium is attached to useful infrastructure: room tuning, spatial playback, multi-room integration and home-theater expansion. It looks unusual without requiring the buyer to treat the speaker as sculpture first.

See Sonos Era 300

Evidence used

Sonos Era 300
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A9
Devialet Phantom II 98 dB

Evidence boundary: Row & Ledger has not physically auditioned these speakers in the same room. Tonality, imaging, bass quality, room interaction and software reliability remain human-verification items.

Help us improve the edit.

Optional reading analytics tell us how long an article stays active, which sections you reach and whether you follow another article or a product link.

We save your choice and the date you first opted in in this browser. Reports group article reads; we do not collect names, form contents or recordings, and we do not send a persistent browser identifier. Reading records are removed on a 45-day retention schedule. Existing Cloudflare traffic and performance measurement is separate.

Optional reading analytics are off.